Global China Pulse

Volume 1, Issue 1, 2022

Content

Front Matter

Editorial

Briefs

Op-Eds

What is Global China?

Ching Kwan Lee

Understanding the China Development Bank in Latin America

Latinoamérica Sustentable (LAS)

What’s Behind the Diplomatic Spat between China and Lithuania?

Vida Macikenaite

How Global Capitalism Became Humanity’s ‘Fate’ in Xi Jinping’s New Era

Ryan Martínez Mitchell

Essays

China’s Overseas Energy Investments after the ‘No Coal’ Pledge: An Assessment

Danqing Li, Siman Li, Mark Bo

Translating China’s Special Economic Zone ‘Model’ into Rural Southern India: Impacts on Urban Development

Charlotte Goodburn, Jan Knoerich

Overlapping Agendas on the Belt and Road: The Case of the Sihanoukville Special Economic Zone

Mark Bo, Neil Loughlin

Civil Society’s Multifaceted Response to China’s Belt and Road Initiative

Shawn Shieh

High-Profile Infrastructure and China’s Global Influence Gamble

Austin Strange

Pragmatic Living in Motion: Two Chinese ‘Migrants’ and their Meanderings in the ‘City of Gold’

Romain Dittgen

Project Spotlight

Boten: From Dawn till Dusk

Jessica DiCarlo, Nicholas Bosoni

Voices from the Ground

Engaging with China in Latin America: A Conversation with Paulina Garzón

Mark Bo, Paulina Garzón

Books

Chinese Soft Power: A Conversation with Maria Repnikova

Nicholas Loubere, Maria Repnikova

Clash of Empires: A Conversation with Ho-fung Hung

Hong Zhang, Ho-fung Hung

Contributors

Bibliography

About the Journal

ISSN: 2004-4607
Publisher: Lund University, Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies
Frequency: 2 issues/year

Global China Pulse (GCP) is an open access biannual publication that focuses on China’s international engagements in their various manifestations. Alongside the informational infrastructure The People’s Map of Global China provides, GCP offers a new space to publish content in a variety of styles and, possibly, experiment with different approaches and formats. GCP rests on two pillars: the conviction that today more than ever it is necessary to bridge the gap between the scholarly community, civil society, and the general public; and the related belief that open access is necessary to ethically reappropriate academic research from commercial publishers who restrict the free circulation of ideas.